<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The honeymoon is over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meat.net/2004/07/the-honeymoon-is-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meat.net/2004/07/the-honeymoon-is-over/</link>
	<description>David Terrell&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:25:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Howard</title>
		<link>http://meat.net/2004/07/the-honeymoon-is-over/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sphinx.catch22.org/wordpress/?p=85#comment-26</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s to be unhappy about voting for Nader in 2000?  If he&#039;s the guy you want, you vote for him .. if John Kerry doesn&#039;t really do it for you, but Nader does ... nothing wrong with that.

I voted for Nader is 2000 as well.  I don&#039;t feel bad about it.  I could potentially vote for him again, but I am looking forward to the Democrats representing themselves as something more intersting than &quot;not George Bush&quot; ... I believe the competitive primary and the Howard Dean thing may have left them thinking, and we should see a slightly interesting platform ... then I can vote for Kerry and feel good about that.

Yes, George Bush is evil and he must be stopped, but those of us who do not live in swing states have the luxury of voting for the guy that best expresses our beliefs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s to be unhappy about voting for Nader in 2000?  If he&#8217;s the guy you want, you vote for him .. if John Kerry doesn&#8217;t really do it for you, but Nader does &#8230; nothing wrong with that.</p>
<p>I voted for Nader is 2000 as well.  I don&#8217;t feel bad about it.  I could potentially vote for him again, but I am looking forward to the Democrats representing themselves as something more intersting than &#8220;not George Bush&#8221; &#8230; I believe the competitive primary and the Howard Dean thing may have left them thinking, and we should see a slightly interesting platform &#8230; then I can vote for Kerry and feel good about that.</p>
<p>Yes, George Bush is evil and he must be stopped, but those of us who do not live in swing states have the luxury of voting for the guy that best expresses our beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

